The response to McCall's memo was good. The managers seemed to take delight in relating how they
spent their motivational fund. It seemed to McCall that they were in competition with each other to see
who could come up with the most innovative plan. McCall was pleased to learn that they had been
putting their motivational funds to good use. He also was pleased with the attitudes of the managers.
Morale seemed to be high. The managers seemed to relate to each other exceptionally well, except
for two isolated cases about which McCall had been made aware by his predecessor and for which
he was taking steps to remedy.
In summarizing what he learned from the managers' presentations, he categorized the managers'
programs into three groups. Twelve of the district managers had developed some sort of program to
reward the sales reps' total effort for the year much along the lines of the Chicago district's program.
Seven of the managers used the money for shorter special-purpose programs such as competitions
to encourage certain desired behavior such as pushing certain products or getting new accounts.
One such program stood out in McCall's mind since it particularly impressed him at the time. The
manager of the New York office had become concerned with the tendency of the reps to concentrate
on the firm's established accounts. He wanted them to make more calls on potentially new accounts.
To that end, he designed a competition to reward those reps who not only called on prospective
accounts but also managed to make them new customers. Since it usually took many calls on a
prospective account before a sale was made, the contest had been conducted over a two-year period.
Six of the managers used the money for doing several smaller, short-run, action-oriented, one-shot
deals. For example, the manager of the Charlotte, North Carolina, district walked into the office one
midsummer day waving two season tickets for the city's professional basketball team. She
announced, "These go to the person who brings in the first new account this month." That resulted in
a flurry of new account activity and a dispute between two reps over who brought in the first new
account. The manager settled the argument by giving both of them two season tickets. She made two
reps happy. McCall was impressed with her understanding in handling what could have been a sticky
situation.
On another occasion, she walked in and announced that if the district met its quotas for the quarter,
all reps and their families would be treated to a long weekend outing on a chartered boat out of seaside
town of Wilmington. The district sales volume had not been up to plan, but that quickly changed
as everyone started working hard for their boat rides.
McCall was not sure which of these models was best for the company, in either the short run or the
long run. He had heard some of the managers talking about how much they liked learning about what
the other managers were doing with their motivational money. He wondered if such information should
be included the company's monthly newsletter. How would such information be used? Would a rep
in Chicago pressure the manager for a competition that provided season tickets to the Chicago
Bulls or Bears basketball games after learning of the Charlotte program?
After consideration, McCall felt that the money was being well spent and wondered if it should be
increased. He had several questions: What returns were being realized from those expenditures? How
could he build a case to his superiors for increasing the motivation funds budget? Should he do it
across the board or test it by giving an increased budget to a district manager representative of each
of the three types of programs that were evidenced?
8