QUESTION2
[25 MARKS)
Case Study: Government Pharmaceutical Tendering Process
The Namibian government is currently embroiled in controversy over its pharmaceutical
tendering process. The Health Minister has expressed concerns about the use of middlemen in
health tenders, citing worries about inflated prices and the influence of "tenderpreneurs" on
medical contracts. A recent tender for the supply of medicines, valued at over N$ l billion, has
attracted the attention of 22 companies, both local and international. The bidding process has
raised questions about transparency, fairness, and potential instances of supply chain fraud.
The tender process for pharmaceutical supplies entails the submission of bids by a range of
companies, including both domestic and international firms. These bids are currently under
evaluation by the Central Procurement Board (CPB), with concerns emerging regarding the
role of intermediaries and the potential for price inflation. Bid variations have been observed,
with some local companies bidding for nearly N$ l billion while others offer considerably lower
quotations. This disparity in bid amounts, coupled with the participation of international
companies, raises questions about pricing consistency and fair competition. The Minister has
voiced apprehensions regarding inflated prices for essential medicines, highlighting potential
implications for the accessibility of healthcare services among Namibian citizens. Given the
susceptibility of the pharmaceutical tendering process to various forms of supply chain fraud,
the involvement of middlemen and the potential for tender manipulation warrant heightened
vigilance to mitigate the risk of fraudulent activities.
Source: The Namibian (Nov 2018)
Analyse the case and discuss, with practical examples, any five possible supply chain
frauds that the ministry must be vigilant about. You are expected to discuss each fraud
in the context of the case.
QUESTION 4
[20 MARKS)
Company XYZ entered a 56-month contract to rent vehicles for $15 million instead of buying
them for $12 million. Upon enquiries, the company justified their reason on the grounds that
the rental contract includes maintenance, making it cheaper on operating costs. The contract,
however, doesn't include fuel, and maintenance is capped at 100 km a day. If the car runs above
100 km a day, Company XYZ is responsible for the maintenance. Only four companies
submitted bids, of which only one company's key activity is car rentals.
4.1 Identify any five key principles of procurement and evaluate whether they were upheld or
compromised in this case?
(15 marks)
4.2 Do you think the company made the right decision?
(5 marks)
You are more than welcome to make any relevant assumptions; however, they should be
stated in your answers.
7