QUESTION 1
Choose a correct answer from the options given in each of the following statements. Only write
down the letter with a correct answer for each statement. Use BLOCKCAPITALLETTERS.(40)
1.1 The difference between the passing of the risk rule and the rule of impossibility of performance
can be explained as follows:
A. The risk rule is an exception to the general principles of the law of contract.
B. The rule of impossibility of performance states that the contract terminates in the event of
supervening impossibility of performance.
C. The rule of impossibility of performance, i.e. the fact that the contract terminates in the event
of supervening impossibility of performance does not apply to a contract of purchase and sale,
whilst the risk rule states that the seller will be relieved of his/her duty to deliver if
performance becomes impossible, the purchaser will still be liable for the purchase price if
the contract is perfecta.
D. The risk rule states that the seller has a duty to care for the merx from the time of the
conclusion of the contract until the time of delivery.
E. The risk rule will not apply if the parties agree that the risk would not pass to the purchaser.
1.2 When a seller delivers the merx sold to the purchaser, the
disturbance in his possession by virtue of the:
A. Guarantee against latent defects.
B. Guarantee against eviction.
C. Passing of the risk rule.
D. Actio empty.
E. None of the above.
purchaser
is protected
against
1.3 The following statement is not true:
A. A voetstoots sale means that the thing is sold as good or as bad as it is.
B. A voetstoots sale is never implied, the parties must expressly agree on it.
C. Goods sold at a sale in execution are sold voetstoots.
D. The seller can never be liable for any latent defects if a thing is sold voetstoots.
E. None of the above.
1.4 Which of the following statements is false in relation to a contract of sale?
A. A seller need not guarantee that he is the owner of the things sold but needs to provide the
purchaser with a warranty that he will receive the merx free from encumbrances.
B. An implied warranty against eviction guarantees that no third party with a better title will
deprive the purchaser of his possession of the merx.
C. Where both the seller and buyer believe a thing to be sold exists but it later transpires that
the thing doesn't, a valid contract is nevertheless concluded.
D. There cannot be a valid contract of sale if the parties concerned do not reach agreement about
the price.
E. Neither one of the above options.
2