Section A: Reading Comprehension
[30 marks]
Read the passage below and then answer the questions that follow in your answer book.
The importance of film sound
Though we might think of film as an essentially visual experience, we really cannot afford to
underestimate the importance of film sound. A meaningful sound track is often as
complicated as the image on the screen, and it is ultimately just as much the responsibility of
the director. The entire sound track consists of three essential ingredients: the human voice,
sound effects and music. These three tracks must be mixed and balanced so as to produce
the necessary emphases which in turn create desired effects. Topics which essentially refer
to the three previously mentioned tracks are discussed below. They include dialogue,
synchronous and asynchronous sound effects, and music. As film technology has evolved, so
has the subtlety and creativity with which sound is employed, making it an increasingly vital
narrative device rather than mere background accompaniment.
Let us start with dialogue. As is the case with stage drama, dialogue serves to tell the story
and expresses feelings and motivations of characters as well. Often with film characterisation
the audience perceives little or no difference between the character and the actor. Thus, for
example, the actor Humphrey Bogart is the character Sam Spade; film personality and life
personality seem to merge. Perhaps this is because the very texture of a performer's voice
supplies an element of character. It is the grain of the voice, its pitch, accent, hesitations, and
intonations, that offer a deeper psychological reading of the character than words alone could
convey.
When voice textures fit the performer's physiognomy (facial characteristics) and gestures, a
whole and very realistic persona emerges. The viewer sees not an actor working at his craft,
but another human being struggling with life. It is interesting to note that how dialogue is
used and the very amount of dialogue used varies widely among films. For example, in the
highly successful science-fiction film 2001, little dialogue was evident, and most of it was
banal and of little intrinsic interest. In this way the film-maker was able to portray what
Thomas Sobochack and Vivian Sobochack call, in An Introduction to Film, the 'inadequacy of
human responses when compared with the magnificent technology created by man and the
visual beauties of the universe'. Such strategic sparseness creates a silence that speaks
volumes, allowing visual imagery to resonate more profoundly with the viewer.
The comedy Bringing Up Baby, on the other hand, presents practically non-stop dialogue
delivered at breakneck speed. This use of dialogue underscores not only the dizzy quality of
the character played by Katherine Hepburn, but also the absurdity of the film itself and thus
its humour. The audience is bounced from gag to gag and conversation to conversation; there
is no time for audience reflection. The audience is caught up in a whirlwind of activity in simply
managing to follow the plot. This film presents pure escapism-largely due to its frenetic
dialogue. However, such techniques also serve a narrative function, with verbal chaos
mirroring thematic disarray, thereby reinforcing character dynamics and narrative
momentum.
2