Planning for Housing
PNH610S
Question 4
NUSTand the Kalkrand Village Council are engaging in a collaborative effort to upgrade the
Pappegaai Informal Settlement in the Village.
(a) As an urban planner, formulate a recommendary note to the Kalkrand Village Council wherein
you persuade officials to undertake the upgrading of the informal settlement In-situ.
(4)
(b) In addition to advocating for In-situ upgrading, provide justification for a Participatory Informal
Settlement Upgrading Approach as the two interventions are complimentary as well as
complementary.
(6)
(10)
Question 5
Rolnik (2014), argued that a house is an important aspect that creates a sense of belonging in a city,
and anyone who is deprived of having accessto adequate housing is said to be deprived of the
chance of enjoying and being part of the city.
(a) Demonstrate the validity of the statement above by referring to the housing situation in any
informal settlement you are familiar with.
(2)
(b) What is your interpretation of the Kemeny Thesis?
(5)
(c) How would you justify the application of the Fordist doctrine of mass production and
standardisation in a housing programme?
(3)
(10)
Question 6
(a) Provide directives to a Local Authority on how it should integrate the Flexible Land Tenure Act,
(Act No. 4 of 2012) (FLTS)into informal settlement upgrading projects?
(5)
(b) Provide the most likely Zoning and Density factor that you will assign to block erven designed
under the Flexible LandTenure Scheme?
(2)
The Implementation of a Flexible Land Tenure Scheme could benefit greatly if it draws on the United
Nations principles of Participatory Slum Upgrading.
(c) Why do you think the statement above is valid?
(3)
(10)
Second Opportunity/ Supplementary Examination Question Paper
Page 3 of 5
July 2025