Question 2
[15]
2.1 A group of scientists used radioactive isotopes to date sediments from lakes and
estuaries. To verify this method, they analysed a 2°8Po standard known to have an
activity of 77.5 decays/min and obtained the following results.
77.09
78.03
75.37
74.96
72.42
77.54
76.84
76.09
77.84
81.12
76.69
75.75
Determine whether there is a significant difference between the mean and the
expected value at a = 0.05.
(6)
2.2 Two analytical chemists have reported a method for monitoring the
concentration of SO2 in air. They compared their method to the standard
method by analysing urban air samples collected from a single location.
Samples were collected by drawing air through a collection solution for 6 min.
Shown here is a summary of their results with SO2 concentrations reported in
mL/m3.
standard
method:
new
method:
21.62
24.25
21.54
24.62
22.20
23.09
20.51
25.72
24.27
21.02
22.31
21.54
23.54
21.30
Using an appropriate statistical test determine whether there is any significant
difference between the standard method and the new method at a = 0.05.
(9)
Question 3
[20]
3.1 A standard sample contains 10.0 mg/L of analyte and 15.0 mg/L of internal
standard. Analysis of the sample gives signals for the analyte and internal standard
of 0.155 and 0.233 (arbitrary units), respectively. Sufficient internal standard is
added to a sample to make its concentration 15.0 mg/L. Analysis of the sample
yields signals for the analyte and internal standard of 0.274 and 0.198,
respectively. Report the analyte’s concentration in the sample.
(4)
3.2 Serum containing Na* gave a signal of 4.27 mV in an atomic emission analysis.
Then 5.00 mL of 2.08 M NaCl were added to 95.0 mL of serum. This spiked serum
gave a signal of 7.98 mV.
(a) What is the actual concentration of Na* spiked in the sample?
(2)
(b) Find the original concentration of Na* in the serum.
(3)