Appendix 2
AADLLongRunFormandBoundsTest
DependeVntariableD: (LNOPEN)
SelecteMd odeAl:ADL(12,,1)
Case3:UnrestricteCdonstanatndNoTrend
Date0: 4/12/25nme:23:20
Sample1:996Q21021Q4
(1)
Includeodbservation1s0: 2
Dependent Variable: D(LNOPEN)
Method: ARDL
Date: 04/12/25 nme: 23:30
Sample (adjusted): 199604 202104
Included observations: 101 after adjustments
Maximum dependentlags: 1 (Automatic selection)
IV,odelselection method: Akaike info criterion (AIC)
D~amic regressors (2 lags, automatic): D(LNCA) D(LNIMP) ECT(-1)
Fixed regressors: C
Number of models evalulated: 27
Selected IV,odel:ARDL(1, 1, 1, 0)
(5)
Note: final equation sample Is larger than selection sample
Variable
Coefficient
Std. Error
I-Statistic Prob:
ConditionaElrrorCorrectioRnegresison
Variable
Coefficient Std.Error I-Statistic
C
LNOPEN(-1)'
LNC,A{-1)
LNIMP(-1)
D(LNCA)
D(LNC,A{-1))
D(LNIMP)
0.103662 0.052256 1.983749
0.069310 0.021237 3.263589
-0.000568 0.001124 -0.505756
-0.009994 0.004810 -2.077867
0.014803 0.003818 3.876934
0.006842 0.003415 2.003708
0.612592 0.046703 13.11690
Prob.
0.0502
D(LNOPEN(-1))
D(LNCA)
D(LNCA(-1))
D(LNIMP)
D(LNIMP(-1))
ECT(-1)
0.0015===c==========
0.6142R-squared
0_0404AS.dEju. sotef dregRre-ssqsuioanred
0.0002Sum squared resid
0,0479Log likelihood
F-statistic
0.0000Prob(F-statistic)
1.083886
0.015952
-0.014624
0.683029
-0.725602
-0.380238
0.000283
0.794857
0.781763
0.010565
0.010492
319.8887
60.70292
0.000000
0.227765
0.003176
0.005214
0.049443
0.150387
0.232099
0.002225
4.758794
5.022146
-2.804820
13.81440
-4.824910
-1.638256
0.127348
0.0000
0.0000
0.0061
0.0000
0.0000
0.1047
0.8989
Mean dependent var
S.D. dependent var
Akaike Info criterion
Schwarz criterion
Hannan-Quinn criter.
Durbin-Watson stat
-0.001359
0.022615
·6.195817
-6.014571
-6.122443
2.057620
• p-valueincompatibwleithI-Bounddsistribution.
(2)
Lewis Equation
Case3:UnrestricteCdonstanatndNoTrend
1.2----------------
1.0
0.8
Variable
LNCA
LNIMP
Coefficient Std.Error I-Statistic Prob. 0·6
0-4
0.008202 0.016631 0.493159 0.623(
0.144192 0.066745 2.160347 0.033~0-2
(6)
.... ..•··
..-··
__...-··
....•· ....-.·· ...··
__...-··_·,,.•·
..-····
EC=LNOPE•N(0.0082'LNC+A0.1442'LNIMP)
-0.2 --1-n-"TTI'"'"TT,,.,.,.,,.,..,...m-n.,.,,.,.rrn,.,,...,.m-n""TT...,.-.,.,.,.,...,.,..,...,,,..,.,..,.,.,
F-BoundTsest
(3)
98
NullHypothesiNs:olewisrelationship
00
02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18
j - I CUSUM of Squares •··•• 5% Significance
20
TestStatistic
Value
Signif.
1(0)
1(1)
(7)
ki~ptotic: n=1000
Breusch-GodfreySCeroiarrlelatioLnMTest:
F-statistic
k
3.836443
2
10%
5%
2.5%
3.17
3.79
4.41
4.14
4.85
F-statistic
5.52 Obs'R-squared
0.376532ProbF. (2,92)
0.820021ProbC. hi-Square(2)
0.6873
0.6636
1%
5.15 6.36
/lctuaSl ampleSize
102
FiniteSamplen:=80 20.,....---------------,
10%
3.26 4.247
5%
3.94 5.04316
1%
5.407 6.783
(8)
SeriesR: esiduals
Sampl1e99602402104
Observa1i1o0n1s
12
HeteroskedasticityWTeiitset: (4)
F-statistic
Obs*R-squared
ScaleedxplaineSdS
4.204623ProbF. (6,94)
21.37088ProbC. hi-Square(6)
31.10320ProbC. hi-Square(6)
0.0009
0.0016
0.0000
I.lean -ll.93e-19
Median -0.000854
1,laximum 0.033202
Minimum -0.030195
StdD. ev. 0.010243
Skewness 0.179275
Kurtosis 4.360468
Jarque-Ber8a.330107
Probabifrty 0.015529
--0.03 --0.02 --0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 O.Ol
7