SECTION B
[40]
Question 2: Read the case study below and answer questions that follow:
Case Study: The Shoprite Namibia Workers' Strike
In December 2020, employees of Shoprite Namibia, embarked on a nationwide strike. The
industrial action was organized by the Namibia Food and Allied Workers Union (NAFAU),
which had been negotiating with the employer over wages, working hours, and job security.
Workers demanded wage increases and improvements in their employment terms, citing long-
standing grievances about being employed on short-term contracts for extended periods, low
pay, and alleged unfair treatment between categories of staff.
The dispute escalated when Shoprite continued operations during the strike by employing
temporary workers, including casual and fixed-term staff, to perform the duties of the striking
employees. The Union accused the company of undermining the strike and violating fair labour
practices. The matter was taken to the Labour Court, where the union sought an interdict to
prevent Shoprite from employing replacement labour during the strike. The court's ruling,
issued in early January 2021, addressed the legality and fairness of the company's actions,
balancing the rights of workers to strike with the company's right to continue its business
operations.
This case raised broader concerns regarding the application of employment equity, the ethics
of labour relations, and the effectiveness of collective bargaining structures in Namibia's labour
market. It also revealed deeper tensions in the relationship between workers and employers
in the retail sector, especially in balancing commercial interests with decent work principles.
Source: adapted from: https://namiblii .org/akn/na/judgment/nalcmd/2021 /45/eng%402021-
01-08
2.1 Briefly explain the role that NAFAU played in this case?
(4)
2.2 Describe the underlying reasons for the 2020 strike at Shoprite Namibia.
(5)
2.3 Discuss whether Shoprite's decision to hire replacement workers during the strike was
ethically justified, given the Namibia's Labour Laws.
(6)
2.4 This case reflects on challenges of achieving employment equity in the retail sector in
Namibia? Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
(6)
5