QUESTION 1
(Compulsory)
50 MARKS
Attached to this question paper (see Appendix 1) is a repo rt about a news crew from
Citizen TV in Kenya filming a woman about to give birth on the street, after she was
turned away from a hospital during a nationwide strike by health workers. Analyse the
circumstances of the case by reading and grasping the details attached, before
responding in full to the following questions:
(a) What were the ethical choices available to the reporter and news crew? (3 marks).
(b) If you were the reporter on the scene, and were influenced by Francis Kasoma ' s
principles of Afri-Ethics, explain whether or not your response to the pregnant
woman's predicament might have been different from the actions of the Citizen TV
news crew ........................................................................ ............... ............ ..... .. .. (17 marks).
(c) Which ethical principles did the Citizen TV news crew ultimately use: virtue ethics,
util itarian ethics, or duty ethics? Give elaborate reasons to support your
categorisation and cite the scholar(s) who originated the principle(s) you believe the
news crew to have chosen .... .......................... ..................... ..................... ......... (30 marks).
QUESTION 2
25 MARKS
Create a Code of Conduct and Ethics for online content contributors that ensures
discip line, fairness, and respect in pursuing the truth and serving the public needs for
information, education and entertainment.
QUESTION 3
25 MARKS
In his determination of a defamation lawsuit brought by the former First Lady of
Namibia against an opposition politician (Geingos v Hishoono), a Windhoek High Court
judge, Justice Sibeya, cited Article 8 of the Namibian Constitution, which states that
"The dignity of all persons shall be inviolable ...".
The judge reaffirmed that "The Constitution is the law which all other laws, common
law and statutory laws, must conform to. The Constitution is, therefore, the point of
departure in a quest to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms" (sub-section 44,
Geingos v Hishoono). Justice Sibeya concluded that :
"It follows from the above Constitutional provision that ... where one's dignity is
violated through defamatory statements, the protection provided in the Constitution
cannot be sidestepped. The Constitution, in my view, is the starting point to enforce
2